Laravel Middleware / Route Groups

laravel route group
laravel route group(('middleware))
laravel middleware except
laravel route group example
laravel admin middleware
laravel auth middleware
laravel route::resource
laravel get route name

I'm fairly new to Laravel, so this question may obvious to some.

In the case of running checks per HTTP request, for example User Authentication. Is there a better, more efficient or simple correct way to run these checks. From my initial research it would seem that this could be accomplished using either MiddleWare, eg.

public function __construct()
{
    $this->middleware('auth');
}

It also seems like it would be possible using routing groups, eg.

Route::group(['middleware' => 'auth'], function () {
    Route::get('/', function ()    {
        // Uses Auth Middleware
    });

    Route::get('user/profile', function () {
        // Uses Auth Middleware
    });
});

Is there any benefits of doing this either of these two ways? Apart from the obvious benefit of not having to put $this->middleware('auth'); in every controller auth would need to be checked.

Thanks

Edit..

After taking on your advice I attempted to utilities the route grouping to control my Auth MiddleWare. But this has seemed to have broken my site.

Route::group(['middleware' => 'auth'], function () {
    Route::auth();

    Route::get('/home', 'HomeController@index');

    Route::get ( '/redirect/{provider}', 'SocialAuthController@redirect' );
    Route::get ( '/callback/{provider}', 'SocialAuthController@callback' );
});

Am I missing something obvious?

Using Route group is easy for maintenance/modification , other wise you will have to remember each controller where you are using certain middle ware, of course this not a concern in a small medium sized application, but this will be hard in a large application where is lots of controller and references to middle ware.

Middleware - Laravel, Instead of registering your middleware in the $middleware array, you should register it in $routeMiddleware like so: protected� Route Groups. Route groups allow you to share route attributes, such as middleware or namespaces, across a large number of routes without needing to define those attributes on each individual route. Shared attributes are specified in an array format as the first parameter to the Route::group method.

There is no real difference, personally i use groups for the standard middleware and put exceptions in the construct

HTTP Routing - Laravel, I have created a gate and now I am trying to control access to my admin controller via middleware in the Web.php routes file. public function� Route Groups Route Groups is an essential feature in Laravel, which allows you to group all the routes. Routes Groups are beneficial when you want to apply the attributes to all the routes. If you use route groups, you do not have to apply the attributes individually to each route; this avoids duplication.

You are almost there, just remove the Route::auth():

Route::group(['middleware' => 'auth'], function () {
    Route::get('/home', 'HomeController@index');
    //add more Routes here
});

Laravel add custom middleware to route group, I have a route group with admin URL prefix, that looks like this: But I want to combine this with using the auth middleware, but this didn't work: not is in https ://laravel.com/api/5.5/Illuminate/Routing/Route.html not is in class� I have a Route group in laravel which has middleware of auth. Route::group(['middleware'=>'auth', function() { //Routes }); Now these routes are only available to logged in users. I have a situation that logged in users have privileges. I have some routes that are only to be visited by logged in users AND if they have privilege of OWNER

How to apply a middleware on a route group?, As you can see, the keys can reference either a class or a route-specific middleware shortcut like throttle or auth . Let's make an admin group: A real-life scenario: you want to have URLs like account/*** under the same Route group with a prefix, but some of them should be also restricted with Auth Middleware.No problem – you can create a Group within a Group!

Combined route group with prefix and auth middleware?, Applying auth or authorization middleware on Laravel route groups 3. Refactoring route Duration: 10:29 Posted: Jan 29, 2020 Trying to apply more than one middleware on a route group! Currently, have several users, with several roles! Some users have access to a route only if is from a group. for this, I have created a middleware (named auth.admin only for tests) The authentication that I'm using, is the AuthBasic. So, I created a route group, with the following config:

Middleware groups in Laravel 5.2, For that, we can create sub-groups in routes/web.php and assign different middlewares/prefixes etc. Route::group([ 'middleware' => 'auth', ],� Laravel includes a cache.headers middleware, which may be used to quickly set the Cache-Control header for a group of routes. If etag is specified in the list of directives, an MD5 hash of the response content will automatically be set as the ETag identifier:

Comments
  • It does the same thing, so pick whatever way you prefer, and stick to it
  • So they have absolutely no difference?
  • Route::auth (); is just a stortcut for declaring all the routes used for registration and login. If you use s decent IDE you can click and go to the method definition, which will show you the routes being created. Laravel uses a lot of abstraction, magic methods and multiple inheritance, so a good ide is a must really
  • Could you suggest a good idea to use with Laravel?
  • Phpstorm if you are willing to spend a few quid , Netbeans if you are not.
  • a middleware used only once or twice, age gate for a specific page for example