Code First can't enable migrations

entity framework code first existing database
entity framework code first migrations
entity framework code first create database
entity framework core code first
how to add new table to existing database code first
how to create table in code first entity framework
code first vs database first
entity framework code first create database if not exist

I'm trying to enable migrations but it's throwing an exception:

Checking if the context targets an existing database... System.TypeInitializationException: The type initializer for 'System.Data.Entity.Migrations.DbMigrationsConfiguration`1' threw an exception. ---> System.TypeInitializationException: The type initializer for 'System.Data.Entity.Internal.AppConfig' threw an exception. ---> System.Configuration.ConfigurationErrorsException: Configuration system failed to initialize ---> System.Configuration.ConfigurationErrorsException: The 'name' attribute must be specified on the 'section' tag.

I'm assuming that the App.config file is not correctly set up (it was automatically set up when I added EF package). All I did was add the connection string:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<configuration>
  <configSections>

  <section Name="entityFramework" type="System.Data.Entity.Internal.ConfigFile.EntityFrameworkSection, EntityFramework, Version=6.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089" requirePermission="false" />
 <!-- For more information on Entity Framework configuration, visit http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkID=237468 --></configSections>

 <connectionStrings>
   <add Name="MyContext" connectionString="data source=MYSERVER;initial catalog=CodeFirstTest;user id=***;password=***;MultipleActiveResultSets=True;App=EntityFramework" providerName="System.Data.SqlClient" />
 </connectionStrings>

 <entityFramework>
   <defaultConnectionFactory type="System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.LocalDbConnectionFactory, EntityFramework">
     <parameters>
       <parameter value="v11.0" />
     </parameters>
   </defaultConnectionFactory>
   <providers>
     <provider invariantName="System.Data.SqlClient" type="System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer" />
   </providers>
 </entityFramework>
</configuration>

I'm using SQL Server 2008 R2.

As I do have a connection string, I don't believe I need the defaultconnectionfactory. Am I correct? (Note: Even without this section I'm still getting the same exception)

What else am I missing?

I had the same issue when my <connectionString /> entry is on top part of the Web.config, Right after <configuration>. Then I tried moving it right before </configuration>, and it worked.

Code First to a New Database, Code First allows you to define your model using C# or VB.Net classes. Additional configuration can optionally be performed using attributes on� The Code First to Database wizard is designed to generate a starting point set of classes that you can then tweak and modify. If your database schema changes you can either manually edit the classes or perform another reverse engineer to overwrite the classes. Using Code First Migrations to an Existing Database

This is mainly to do with the config file. So the actual stack trace that helps is "System.Configuration.ConfigurationErrorsException". There can be many reasons but they all majorly include the correction in the config file as answered earlier. Couple of possibilities which are little different than this are given below (But the stack really tells us)

  1. One possible out of the way reason can be that, your project where the migrations are getting enabled can be different from the startup project. So be sure to add -StartUpProject to your nuget commmand.
  2. Version of the entity framework used can be different in case of two different projects.

Code First to an Existing Database, Create the Application. To keep things simple we will build a basic console application that uses Code First to do the data access: Open Visual� Background. Microsoft Entity Framework abstracts the relational, logical database schema and presents a conceptual schema to the .NET application. It provides object-relational mapping for .NET developers. EF Code First allows developers to create .NET classes, which in turn can be persisted as database objects.

I met with the same issue. My problem is that there are double connection string on the Web.config file. like as below:

<add name="DB1234" ..../> <add name="DB1234" ..../> So we have to check our web.config file first! Good Luck!

Entity Framework - Code First - Can't Store List<String>, Entity Framework does not support collections of primitive types. You can either create an entity (which will be saved to a different table) or do some string� The “code first” note is your hint that two codes may be needed, along with sequencing direction. The “code first” note is an instructional note. If you see “in diseases classified elsewhere” terminology you will assign two codes, with the manifestation code being sequenced after the underlying condition.

In my case I had several projects in the solution and another project was set as the StartUp project. Setting the project that I was trying to enable migrations for as the StartUp project resolved it.

Code-First Database Design with Entity Framework and PostgreSQL , The Cars property will be responsible for all operations on Car entities throughout our application. Initialize the PostgreSQL Database. We can� EF “code-first” enables a pretty sweet code-centric development workflow for working with data. It enables you to: Work with data without ever having to open a designer or define an XML mapping file Define model objects by simply writing “plain old classes” with no base classes required

check the spelling of your 'connectionString' and make sure it is 'connectionStrings' I omitted the 's' before in my own case. After adding the 's', that solved it.

Entity Framework - Code First Approach, It can also be used if you have an empty database and then Code First will add new tables to it. Code First allows you to define your model using C# or VB. Z codes that may only be principal/first-listed diagnosis; Z Codes as Principal, First-listed Diagnosis. Some Z codes are reported only as a primary diagnosis. ICD-10-CM guidelines list which Z codes are reportable only as the first listed diagnosis, with exception (Note: Italics are added for emphasis, bold text is in the original guidelines):

Entity Framework Code First and Code First Migrations for Oracle , Purpose. This tutorial demonstrates how to use Entity Framework (EF) Code First with Oracle Data Provider for .NET (ODP.NET). You will create .NET classes in� The first real-life test of RCA's bull's-eye bar code was at the Kroger Kenwood Plaza store in Cincinnati. (Courtesy of the ID History Museum). They soon found the Woodland and Silver patent.

Code First, Code-First APIs will create the database on the fly based on your entity classes and configuration. It can also update the database if the model changes, using a � The first 3 digits of the barcode is the country code wherein the product was made. Sample: All barcodes that start at 690 – 695 are all MADE IN CHINA. 471 is Made in Taiwan Government and

Programming Entity Framework: Code First [Book], Take advantage of the Code First data modeling approach in ADO. Learn exactly what Code First does—and does not—enable you to do; Understand how � TheAnswerHub is a top destination for finding answers online. Browse our content today! Find how to code on TheAnswerHub.com.

Comments
  • Name should be name, I'm guessing. =)
  • You're correct. This is the answer. Under <entityFramework> I have <providers> and this is not in the xsd. Should it be removed somewhere else?
  • That I have no idea about, sorry.
  • Just so future readers know, the first element after <configuration> must be <configSections> if there are any custom configuration sections defined. Entity Framework adds a custom configuration section named <entityFramework>. Therefore, especially when using Entity Framework, you'll break your app if you put anything else right after <configuration>.
  • For me, my <connectionString> was placed in the right place, but we had some build transformations going on. When the code was built by TFS after we deployed it it was using the wrong values for the connection string.
  • Nice one, #1 was the problem. Thanks.
  • This error occurred for me when Web.config (or App.config in the original author's case) had some unintended characters in it. Check your version control diff and see if you've made any unwanted changes to that config file.
  • Simply right-clicking the desired project and setting as the startup worked for me. Thanks for this.