How to merge current branch into master locally, with conflicts, ignoring changes in master?

git merge
git merge branch to master
git merge ours
git rebase
git merge conflict
git merge strategy
git merge branch to another branch
git merge-file

Hi I was trying to merge my current branch into master, but it said I have merge conflicts.

I tried so many answers but none of them have been able to solve my problem. The steps given by gitlab also don't seem to work.

I tried rebasing, checking out and what not. I have ended up with detached heads, and loads of things I don't really understand. What I want to know is, how to merge by current branch, named test into master. I don't care what is there in master. I just want to merge exactly what's there in my current branch into master. Can anyone help me?

What steps should I follow after I do

git clone test link

If you really don't care what's in master (e.g. other work in master you or other developers have done will be "lost", and history will be changed), then:

git checkout master
git reset --hard your-branch-name
What this does

* B1 <- [your-branch-name]
| * C2 <- [master]
* C1


* B1 <- [your-branch-name][master]
| * C2 ("lost")
* C1

Changes in C2 will be "lost" -- it will still exist in temporary backup for a while, but has no named branch pointing to it anymore (and will be garbage collected at some point)

History will be changed -- in the "After" state, it'll seem like master never had changes in C2 to begin with.

Advanced Merging, While we covered some basics on resolving merge conflicts in Basic Merge git checkout master Switched to branch 'master' $ vim hello.rb $ git diff diff --git In the ignore-space-change merge, we actually ended up with a few lines with the commits in either side of the merge that touch a file that's currently conflicted. switch to master branch on your local repository using git checkout master. update local master with remote master using git pull origin master. merge br-1 into local master using git merge br-1. This may give you conflicts which need to be resolved and changes committed before moving further. Once merge of br-1 to master on local is committed

Please first check git status to see which files you have changed.

The use git merge to see the files which could be overwritten.

then remove them using

rm filename

and then

git merge.

Basic Branching and Merging, Create a branch for a new user story you're working on. For now, let's assume you've committed all your changes, so you can switch back to your master branch : If you need to pull it in, you can merge your master branch into your iss53 Merging: index.html Normal merge conflict for 'index.html': {local}: modified file� But when there are changes pushed from a different system (probably from a different developer) you'll see a conflict as soon as you try to push your merge back (the 4th step). The only solution now is to merge your local master into the remotes master, which ends up in a pretty ugly "merged master into origin/master" merge commit.

With git merge

  1. Merge master into your test branch first
    git checkout test
    git merge master
    // fix the conflict code
    git commit -am "merge with master"
  1. Then merge test into master
   git checkout master
   git merge test

With git rebase

  1. Rebase master on test
    git checkout test
    git rebase master
    // fix the conflict code
    git commit -am "merge with master"
  1. Merge test into master
    git checkout master
    git merge test

Git merge strategy options & examples, Git merge strategies include resolve, recursive, octopus, ours, and subtree. When a piece of work is complete, tested and ready to be merged back into the main merges involving renames, but currently cannot make use of detected copies. implies the preference effectively ignoring all changes from all other branches. git merge branchname takes new commits from the branch branchname, and adds them to the current branch. If necessary, it automatically adds a "Merge" commit on top. git rebase branchname takes new commits from the branch branchname, and inserts them "under" your changes.

7. Merging - Git Pocket Guide [Book], When there are only two branches, the current branch is called “our” side of the git checkout master Switched to branch 'master' $ git merge feature You had made minor changes to main.c on both branches, but those changes “ Unmerged paths” are files with conflicts Git could not resolve. LOCAL.62981.c main.c. When you want to bring the changes in a branch into your current branch, you use a git merge command. The merge takes all the changes in the other branch and applies them to the current branch. What is a merge conflict? In every situation where work can be parallelized, work will eventually overlap.

Resolving a merge conflict using the command line, You can resolve merge conflicts using the command line and a text editor. Tip: You can use the conflict editor on GitHub to resolve competing line change merge conflicts between Navigate into the local Git repository that has the merge conflict. git status > # On branch master > # Your branch and 'origin/ master' have� This merge conflict will also occur even when you attempt the merge in the opposite direction, by merging master into branch2. In summary, a merge conflict happens when you merge two separate branches that contain different changes on the same locations in the same file and it’s unclear which change should take precedence or whether both

git-merge(1), Assume the following history exists and the current branch is " master ": Silently overwrite ignored files from the merge result. in good shape and committed locally, so it will not be clobbered if there are conflicts. To avoid recording unrelated changes in the merge commit, git pull and git merge will also� Since the last master commit directly precedes the last commit of the style branch, git can merge fast-forward by simply moving the branch pointer forward, pointing to the same commit as the style branch. Conflicts do not arise in the fast-forward merge. 02 Check the logs

  • What do you mean by "I don't care what is there in master. I just want to merge exactly what's there in my current branch"? merge implies you want to combine changes in both your branch and master, and git is telling you there's a conflict. (e.g. a line is deleted in one branch, but that same line is changed in another branch.) Git doesn't know which one of two changes should happen.
  • @Kache So is it possible that I don't merge rather overwrite test into master?
  • Of course. master and test are both just branches "pointing" to particular state of code. There are many ways to get master pointing to a state of code identical to what's in test that leave behind different git histories behind for posterity. It just depends what kind of history you'd like to leave behind. I suggested a straightforward answer below that loses history, but there are also alternatives that retain what master used to be and perhaps even what was done to resolve the conflict.
  • Then do I just push?
  • You can then push to make the remote repo into the same state as well. Since you'd be changing "history" the master branch, you'll have to force push.
  • @TabachiHarada has this been useful? Can I get a question upvote if it has?