How can I get list of branches emerging from any branch in git?

git show-branch
git branch
git current branch
git show-branch tree
git find branch point
find the parent branch of a git branch
git get branch
git get target branch

How can I get list of branches emerging from any branch in git ?

Also what is the difference between fetch and pull command in git ?

git fetch
git checkout <branch of interest>
git log --children <commit>

will print a list of descendant commits for a given one which partially answers your question.

pull does fetch and attempts to merge

fetch does not merge

git-show-branch Documentation, A glob pattern that matches branch or tag names under refs/. For example, if you have many topic branches under refs/heads/topic, giving topic/* would show all  For listing all branches – in local and remote repositories, run this command on the terminal: $ git branch -a. The result is shown in the graphic below: The branches in white are the local branches whereas green (master) represents the activebranch. The branches in red are the remote branches i.e. 1. 2. 3. 4.

How can I get list of branches emerging from any branch in git ?

Depending on what you mean here by "emerging" (and assuming that you meant "given branch" not "any branch"), it would be either git branch --contains <branch>, or git branch --merged <branch>.

Fro git-branch manpage:

SYNOPSIS
git branch [--color | --no-color] [-r | -a]
      [-v [--abbrev=<length> | --no-abbrev]]
      [(--merged | --no-merged | --contains) [<commit>]]
DESCRIPTION

With --contains, shows only the branches that contain the named commit (in other words, the branches whose tip commits are descendants of the named commit). With --merged, only branches merged into the named commit (i.e. the branches whose tip commits are reachable from the named commit) will be listed. With --no-merged only branches not merged into the named commit will be listed. If the argument is missing it defaults to HEAD (i.e. the tip of the current branch).

Basic Branching and Merging, All you have to do is switch back to your master branch. changes that conflict with the branch you're checking out, Git won't let you switch branches. araxis bc3 codecompare vimdiff emerge Merging: index.html Normal merge conflict for  We can create local branches and do our work locally and once we are confident we can push those changes by creating a remote branch with the same name. This post is bit details on listing branches with examples for people who are new to git and experienced alike.

The second question is easier. A fetch merely updates the remote racking branches of your current repository from a remote repository (usually the origin), a pull performs a fetch and then merges a remote branch into the currently checked out branch. The exact branches fetched and merged can depend on the config, but git tries to "do the right thing" and succeeds in most common setups.

The first question is a bit more tricky because new branches can be created at any point in any repository from any commit in any given branch's history. In many repositories, most 'normal' branches are all offshoots of each other in some way.

What you can do is look at all branches git branch, git branch -a or git show-ref --heads for a more scriptable version, and see how the branches relate with a symmertic difference.

git log --oneline --left-right branch-a...branch-b

This will show the commits that are not common between the two branches, prefixing them with a < or > to show which branch they are on.

git-branch Documentation, If --list is given, or if there are no non-option arguments, existing branches are listed; the current branch will be highlighted in green and marked with an asterisk​. Method 1: Fetch Remote Tracking Branches. Firstly run git fetch command to update your remote-tracking branches under refs/remotes/<remote_name>/. git fetch Now use following command to list all branches on local and all remote repositories.

Kind of a play off of @CB Bailey but simplified. I use the following command to show all branches containing a commit.

git branch -a --contains <commit>

Git Show Remote Branches – Linux Hint, Let's check all the branches now: $ git branch -a * development experimental hotfix master remotes/origin/development remotes/origin/master. We see that we​  You can get a full list of remote references explicitly with git ls-remote <remote>, or git remote show <remote> for remote branches as well as more information. Nevertheless, a more common way is to take advantage of remote-tracking branches.

The Definitive Guide to Forks and Branches in Git, Today, Linux has many forks (i.e RedHat), all stemming from a shared historical whereas branching only adds a branch to your exiting tree. The git branch command is actually something of a branch management tool. It can list the branches you have, create a new branch, delete branches and rename branches. Most of Git Branching is dedicated to the branch command and it’s used throughout the entire chapter.

Introduction to GitLab Flow, The biggest problem is that many long-running branches emerge that all contain part of the GitHub flow has only feature branches and a master branch. $ git checkout -t origin/remote-branch Branch 'remote-branch' set up to track remote branch 'remote-branch' from 'origin'. Switched to a new branch 'remote-branch' As you can see, the remote tracking information was set automatically : as a consequence, if you commit any modifications, you will automatically push them to the upstream branch.

Git - Tutorial, This also works for branches. To list all commits which are in the master branch but not in the testing branch, use the following command. git log  The way Git branches is incredibly lightweight, making branching operations nearly instantaneous, and switching back and forth between branches generally just as fast. Unlike many other VCSs, Git encourages workflows that branch and merge often, even multiple times in a day.

Comments
  • I am very new to git and not familiar with the usage of git log --children <commit> command. Is there any I can gain understanding of this.
  • instead of <commit> just put the SHA signature - the commit id