express-ws alternative in TypeScript

Related searches

I have been searching for a few days now but still haven’t found any alternative or help writing a TypeScript Declaration for it as I also tried that.

Important is that it works with any other route in express. Authentication, Roles and Path Parameters.

Typings for express-ws have now been created.

The tests show how to use it:

import expressWs from 'express-ws';
const { app, getWss, applyTo } = expressWs(express());


const app = expressWs(express()).app;

Then for example when declaring routes rather than writing:

const myRoutes = function(app: Express) {...}

You need to specify the express-ws type:

import expressWs from 'express-ws';
const myRoutes = function(app: expressWs.Application) {...}

express-ws alternative in TypeScript - node.js - html, express-ws alternative in TypeScript - node.js. The tests show how to use it: import expressWs from 'express-ws'; const { app, getWss, applyTo }� It efficiently handles projects of any size and offers an easy and intuitive interface. PyPy: a fast, compliant alternative implementation of the Python language (2.7.3 and 3.2.3) with several advantages and distinct features including a Just-in-Time compiler for speed, reduced memory use, sandboxing, micro-threads for massive concurrency,

The only problem is that Router type has no ws(...) method. Add

export interface RouterWs extends express.Router {
  ws (route: string, ...cb): RouterWs; 

Then later when getting Router just cast it as your type.

const router = express.Router() as RouterWs;'/somepath', (ws, req) => {...

HenningM/express-ws: WebSocket endpoints for express , Full documentation can be found in the API section below. This section only shows a brief example. Add this line to your Express application: var expressWs =� Typescript was added by cacophobe in Jul 2013 and the latest update was made in Sep 2019. The list of alternatives was updated Jun 2020. It's possible to update the information on Typescript or report it as discontinued, duplicated or spam.

Thanks Derek Hill and Normunds Kalnberzins

Works with routers is better

First import express-ws

import expressWs from 'express-ws';

To use the ws method, you need to strengthen express (I understand it this way)

const { app, getWss, applyTo } = expressWs(express());

after that express.Router contains the ws method, but the type of the typescript is wrong, you only need to convert the type.

const router = express.Router() as expressWs.Router;

Define the routing logic'/echo', (ws, req) => {
    ws.on('message', (msg: String) => {

Finally add router to the express app

app.use("/ws-stuff", router);

websockets/ws: Simple to use, blazing fast and thoroughly , Simple to use, blazing fast and thoroughly tested WebSocket client and server for Node.js HyBi drafts 13-17 (Current default, alternatively option protocolVersion: 13 ) Also see the provided example using express-session . This is a quick step by step tutorial about WebSocket, Node/Express and Typescript. The full source code provided in these examples is lovely hosted by Github.. WebSocket is a communications

Chapter 8. Interacting with servers using HTTP and WebSockets , Creating a simple web server using the Node and Express frameworks; Making the HTTP protocol; Wrapping a WebSocket client into an Angular service that This code is written in TypeScript, and each of the Http object's methods has url Angular offers an alternative syntax that lets you handle observables right in the� Hi, I use node + typescript + express and now I would like to integrate with ws and express-ws. Even though I've installed @ types/ws, the typings do not work.

2. TypeScript. Typescript is the creation of Anders Hejlsberg of Microsoft and is the most intuitive alternative to JavaScript. Hejlsberg comes from the world of C#, which is the most powerful language for enterprise grade application development. You will find glimpses of C# in Typescript.

@Zugwait's answer is correct. req.param() is deprecated. You should use req.params, req.query or req.body.. But just to make it clearer: req.params will be populated with only the route values.