SQL Fastest Way to Count Rows with Where Clause

sql server fast row count
sql count performance tuning
how to optimize count query in oracle
count(*) vs count(1) sql server performance
fastest way to count number of rows in a table
sql count rows
postgres count slow
postgresql count over

I am new to SQL Server, I experience a very slow retrieval in SQL Server from a large table.

Here is my query.

SELECT 
    COUNT(reference) 
FROM 
    shipment_table 
WHERE
    status = 'A' 
    AND shipment_date BETWEEN '2018-01-01' AND '2018-12-31'

I do some research in google, I found this code but I don't know how to add a WHERE clause for this (where status = 'A' and shipment_date BETWEEN '2018-01-01' and '2018-12-31')

SELECT
    Total_Rows= SUM(st.row_count)
FROM
    sys.dm_db_partition_stats st
WHERE
    object_name(object_id) = 'shipment_table' AND (index_id < 2)

Thank you,

Try using COUNT(*) instead of COUNT(reference). They might look like they are the same but they are not. COUNT(column_name) will not include NULL values. So, if you have a column that is nullable it will scan every row just to find what is NULL and what is not. COUNT(*) on the other hand will include nullable values, so it doesn't need to scan every row. It also leverages the cache when the table ENGINE=MYISAM.

SQL COUNT function, record in another table. I am suggesting creating a new index, because this one (if it will not be used) will not get locked during other operations. COUNT() function. The SQL COUNT() function returns the number of rows in a table satisfying the criteria specified in the WHERE clause. It sets the number of rows or non NULL column values. COUNT() returns 0 if there were no matching rows. Syntax: COUNT(*) COUNT( [ALL|DISTINCT] expression ) The above syntax is the general SQL 2003 ANSI standard syntax.

Since most of the record search will be of 'A'.Hope status is char(1) only

Create filtered index on status columns

CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX XI_Status
ON shipment_table (Status)
WHERE Status= 'A'

Create another non clustered index Date column

CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX XI_ShipDate
ON shipment_table (shipment_date)


SELECT COUNT(*) FROM dbo.shipment_table 
where status = 'A' and shipment_date BETWEEN '2018-01-01' 
and '2018-12-31'

SQL Server Count is slow, Here is the one: how do you count the total number of records in a Full Table Scan if it is a heap table) for counting SQL Server records. It gets yet more interesting, when you need to count the number of rows by condition: There are several ways to get the count of records for a SQL Server table and we will look at a few options in this tip. Basic Usage of SQL Server COUNT Function. COUNT is an aggregate function in SQL Server which returns the number of items in a group. COUNT will always return an INT.

You can create a Cluster Index on shipment_date if shipment_date field is like a value insert date, I mean always increasing with each new row

This will increase performance of reads with a given shipment_date range

Basic Oracle Interview Questions with Answers, SQL Sentry's @AaronBertrand shows some tricks for getting row counts efficiently​, and explains why an accurate row count for a large table is a pipe dream. How many rows match a WHERE clause? This is a slightly  There are more efficient ways than using the COUNT() function if the goal is just to retrieve the total row count from a table. One way is to retrieve the row count directly from SQL Server sys.partitions DMV. But most of the time, the COUNT function is still used when counting a subset of rows based on filter criteria specified with in the WHERE clause of a T-SQL statement.

First of all create non cluster index on date field and cluster index on primary key column, then you can use below query will be faster than previous one.

SELECT 
    COUNT(primaryKeyColumn) 
FROM 
    shipment_table 
WHERE
    status = 'A' 
    AND shipment_date BETWEEN '2018-01-01' AND '2018-12-31' 

What is the fastest way to calculate the record COUNT?, In Postgres, there are ways to count orders of magnitude faster. estimate the selectivity of a where clause and from there the number of rows that will After creating a cluster I connect to the coordinator node to run the SQL. Finding the row count of a table is probably the most frequently performed task by SQL developers/programmers. So the obvious thing we all look for is: what is the fastest way to find the row count of a table? Of course there are few ways, I’ll discuss them in this post.

Bad habits : Counting rows the hard way, SET NOCOUNT ON ; SET STATISTICS IO ON ; -- Ensure a USE [databasename] statement has been executed first. Although it is one of the fastest ways to count the number of rows in a table, however, according to sys. You’ll get similar errors in SQL Server, MySQL, and PostgreSQL. It happens because of the WHERE clause. The WHERE clause actually runs before the COUNT function. This is important because you can’t refer to the COUNT function in the WHERE clause, as the WHERE clause determines the count.

Faster PostgreSQL Counting, One way is to retrieve the row count directly from SQL Server sys.partitions DMV. filter criteria specified with in the WHERE clause of a T-SQL statement. Quick question, does the way SQL handles the count(1) vs count(*)  (You can get the same information from sys.dm_db_partition_stats, but in that case change p.rows to p.row_count (yay consistency!). In fact, this is the same view that sp_spaceused uses to derive the count – and while it is much easier to type than the above query, I recommend against using it just to derive a count because of all of the extra calculations it does – unless you want that

fastest way to count big table records, The SQL COUNT() function returns the number of rows in a table we have discussed how to apply COUNT() with various SQL clauses. C OUNT () with HAVING The HAVING clause with SQL COUNT() function can be used to set a condition with the select statement. The HAVING clause is used instead of WHERE clause with SQL COUNT() function. The GROUP BY with HAVING clause retrieves the result for a specific group of a column, which matches the condition specified in the HAVING clause.

Comments
  • create an appropriate (filtered) index on status and shipment_date
  • Answers below point to the issue - the fastest query is the one that will use the indexes on the table in the best way. Sql server typically only uses one index to answer a query. So if it picks status index, and that's not very selective (e.g. there are tons of status A rows) that won't perform well. If it picks ship date index and there are tons of rows in that year (hope for your business there are :) ) then that won't perform well. Only way for it to perform well is if there is an index on both data points