Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
The idea behind
git bisect is to perform a binary search in the history to find a particular regression. Imagine that you have the following development history:
... --- 0 --- 1 --- 2 --- 3 --- 4* --- 5 --- current
You know that your program is not working properly at the
current revision, and that it was working at the revision
0. So the regression was likely introduced in one of the commits
You could try to check out each commit, build it, check if the regression is present or not. If there is a large number of commits, this can take a long time. This is a linear search. We can do better by doing a binary search. This is what the
git bisect command does. At each step it tries to reduce the number of revisions that are potentially bad by half.
You'll use the command like this:
$ git stash save
$ git bisect start
$ git bisect bad
$ git bisect good 0
Bisecting: 2 revisions left to test after this (roughly 2 steps)
[< ... sha ... >] 3
After this command,
git will checkout a commit. In our case, it'll be commit
3. You need to build your program, and check whether or not the regression is present. You'll also need to tell
git the status of this revision with either
git bisect bad if the regression is present, or
git bisect good if it is not.
Let's suppose that the regression was introduced in commit
4. Then the regression is not present in this revision, and we tell it to
$ make test
... ... ...
$ git bisect good
Bisecting: 0 revisions left to test after this (roughly 1 step)
[< ... sha ... >] 5
It will then checkout another commit. Either
5 (as there are only two commits). Let's suppose it picked
5. After a build we test the program and see that the regression is present. We then tell it to
$ make test
... ... ...
$ git bisect bad
Bisecting: 0 revisions left to test after this (roughly 0 steps)
[< ... sha ... >] 4
We test the last revision,
4. And since it is the one that introduced the regression, we tell it to
$ make test
... ... ...
$ git bisect bad
< ... sha ... > is the first bad commit
< ... commit message ... >
In this simple situation, we only had to test 3 versions (
5) instead of 4 (
4). This is a small win, but this is because our history is so small. If the search range is of N commits, we should expect to test 1 + log2 N commits with
git bisect instead of roughly N / 2 commits with a linear search.
Once you've found the commit that introduced the regression, you can study it to find the issue. Once this is done, you use
git bisect reset to put everything back on the original state before using
git bisect command.
A beginner's guide to GIT BISECT, Use git checkout your-branch-name , for example git checkout master if you already checked out an older commit. Then run: git bisect start. So, to avoid such scenarios, you can use the git bisect command to find the bad project revision(or snapshot) and eventually fix it with the git revert command. How does ‘git bisect’ search? This command bisects (divides) your history between the good and the bad commit range. How to discover a bug using git bisect, You answer git bisect good or git bisect bad and git will take care of the rest. It will use binary search to very quickly narrow down the offending To use "old" and "new" instead of "good" and bad, you must run git bisect start without commits as argument and then run the following commands to add the commits: git bisect old [<rev>] to indicate that a commit was before the sought change, or git bisect new [<rev>] git bisect, Learn how to use Git's bisect command with Ember.js as the example. Using Git Bisect. Now that we have both a good and a bad commit, we can use Git bisect. To start the process type: git bisect start git bisect good c26c876 git bisect bad 6f4cf6c Git will now automatically checkout one of the commits that occurred between the good and the bad commits.
Just to add a further point:
We can specify a file name or path to
git bisect start in case we know that the bug has come from particular files.
Suppose we knew that the changes that caused the regression were in the com/workingDir
directory then we can run
git bisect start com/workingDir This means that
only the commits that changed the contents of this directory will be checked, and
this makes things even faster.
Also,If it’s difficult to tell if a particular commit is good or bad, you
git bisect skip, which will ignore it. Given there are enough other
commits, git bisect will use another to narrow the search instead.
How to use git bisect by example, The idea behind git bisect is to perform a binary search in the history to find a particular regression. Imagine that you have the following Everything is up to a specific case. Git will run us through the history, step by step optimising the amount of validations we need to perform. Our job is just to let Git know if at that point in time the code was still “good” or it was already “bad” – “git bisect good” or “git bisect bad”.
$ git bisect .. bascically a
Git tool for debugging. 'Git Bisect' debugs by going through the previous commits since your last (known) working commit. It uses binary search to go through all those commits, to get to the one which introduced the regression/bug.
$ git bisect start # Starting bisect
$ git bisect bad # stating that the current commit (v1.5) has the regression/ setting 'bad' point
$ git bisect good v1.0 # mentioning it the last good working commit (without regression)
This mentioning of 'bad' and 'good' points will help
git bisect (binary search) pick the middle element (commit v1.3). If the regression is there at commit v1.3, you'll set it as the new 'bad' point i.e. ( Good -> v1.0 and Bad -> v1.3) $ git bisect bad
or similarly if the commit v1.3 is bug-free you'll set it as the new 'Good point' i.e. (*Good -> v1.3 and Bad -> v1.6).
$ git bisect good
How to use git bisect?, Here's how to use git bisect , step-by-step! Step 1: Find a commit where things were working. Have a look through the git log for a commit from The git bisect command provides a way to speed up the bug detection process. It lets you pinpoint the problem faster. With git bisect, you can define a range of commits that you suspect have the problematic code and then use binary elimination methods to find the start of the problem. Finding bugs become faster and easier. Using Git bisect to figure out when brokenness was introduced , Git bisect is an easy way to perform a binary search over the commits in your If you can, use git bisect bad to tell git that the commit is broken. The Solution: Git Bisect. Git uses the bisection algorithm to help you search the offending commit. To start, you need to mark a bad commit and a good commit, git will checkout a commit in the middle for you to test. Then you mark it either as good or bad, and then the process starts again. Using Git Bisect To Find Bugs, Use git bisect to track down the commit that introduced a bug.Duration: 3:27
Posted: Jan 3, 2016 Using Git bisect to figure out when brokenness was introduced. Step 1: Find a commit where things were working. Have a look through the git log for a commit from around the time you know things were last Step 2: Find a commit where things are not working. Step 3 - N: Use git bisect to find the
Using Git Bisect, Git tutorials: How to use Git bisect Commands: git bisect start git bisect bad [hash tag] git bisect Duration: 4:46
Posted: Oct 21, 2016 Git bisect is like a wizard: it guides you step by step through a process of elimination until you find the commit that broke your code. Once you type git bisect start, you have started the wizard and it won’t end until you type git bisect reset. Start up the git bisect wizard. Let the git bisect wizard know of a good commit. In this case, it was the ‘Adding the word boat’ commit we picked above. Let the git bisect wizard know of a bad commit.
Comments @01: As the git book says: perform a brute-force search through the project's history. Not so ///brute :-), it uses binary search. "git blame" is similar to "svn blame". "git bisect" is a completely different thing For what it's worth, there's a good description of bisect in Pro Git too. Sylvain's answer is another good shot at it. If after looking at all of that you still don't get it, I'd suggest you ask a more specific question. General questions beget general answers. updated book link: git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Debugging-with-Git#Binary-Search I'm going to contrare here, this is a good explanation of bisect but really doesn't help me use it. Especially since I've managed to find a good commit and I'm on that branch now. From this position this explanation is no help at all. How do I specify the bad branch without checking it out, for example You can use
git bisect bad <rev> [<rev>...] to mark specific revisions as bad (or good with
git bisect good <rev> [<rev>...]).
rev can be any revision identifier like a branch name, a tag, a commit hash (or unique prefix of commit hash), ...
...and once you are done, you type
git bisect reset to put everything back on the recent commit
One of the most awesome answers on stack. Very well articulated. I've been doing this process manually for years, just kind of picking an arbitrary halfway point between a good and bad commit, then again between that one and the good/bad one depending on if it was good/bad itself. It has always been a huge pain in the ass and I had never even heard of this git subcommand until today... hahaha @Nemoden, yes, it can, basically it can be useful for any type of project. You just need to replace "make test" step with "deploy the web site and reproduce the issue" How does git know to keep your new test from disappearing when reverting/bisecting back to a previous/bad revision (that didn't have your newly written test)? @thebjorn you have a point: as far as I know, either the test must be on an external executable in PATH, or in an untracked file in the repo. In many cases this is possible: put the test on a separate file, include necessary test boilerplate with a well crafted
test_script + modular test suite, and run it from the separate file while bisecting. When you fix, merge the test into main test suite.
@CiroSantilli六四事件法轮功纳米比亚威视 Sorry, I rolled back your edit below, because I feel its more explanatory for newbies and its just adding a further point to your answer (not an exact answer as yours--so mentioning that, its to add a point)