Duplicate OpenGL orthographic projection behaviour without OpenGL
opengl projection matrix
orthographic projection matrix
opengl coordinate system
perspective projection matrix
opengl matrix order
perspective matrix explained
I'm encountering a problem trying to replicate the OpenGL behaviour in an ambient without OpenGL.
Basically I need to create an SVG file from a list of lines my program creates. These lines are created using an othigraphic projection.
I'm sure that these lines are calculated correctly because if I try to use them with a OpenGL context with orthographic projection and save the result into an image, the image is correct.
The problem raises when I use the exactly same lines without OpenGL.
I've replicated the OpenGL projection and view matrices and I process every line point like this:
3D_output_point = projection_matrix * view_matrix * 3D_input_point
and then I calculate it's screen (SVG file) position like this:
2D_point_x = (windowWidth / 2) * 3D_point_x + (windowWidth / 2) 2D_point_y = (windowHeight / 2) * 3D_point_y + (windowHeight / 2)
I calculate the othographic projection matrix like this:
float range = 700.0f; float l, t, r, b, n, f; l = -range; r = range; b = -range; t = range; n = -6000; f = 8000; matProj.SetValore(0, 0, 2.0f / (r - l)); matProj.SetValore(0, 1, 0.0f); matProj.SetValore(0, 2, 0.0f); matProj.SetValore(0, 3, 0.0f); matProj.SetValore(1, 0, 0.0f); matProj.SetValore(1, 1, 2.0f / (t - b)); matProj.SetValore(1, 2, 0.0f); matProj.SetValore(1, 3, 0.0f); matProj.SetValore(2, 0, 0.0f); matProj.SetValore(2, 1, 0.0f); matProj.SetValore(2, 2, (-1.0f) / (f - n)); matProj.SetValore(2, 3, 0.0f); matProj.SetValore(3, 0, -(r + l) / (r - l)); matProj.SetValore(3, 1, -(t + b) / (t - b)); matProj.SetValore(3, 2, -n / (f - n)); matProj.SetValore(3, 3, 1.0f);
and the view matrix this way:
CVettore position, lookAt, up; position.AssegnaCoordinate(rtRay->m_pCam->Vp.x, rtRay->m_pCam->Vp.y, rtRay->m_pCam->Vp.z); lookAt.AssegnaCoordinate(rtRay->m_pCam->Lp.x, rtRay->m_pCam->Lp.y, rtRay->m_pCam->Lp.z); up.AssegnaCoordinate(rtRay->m_pCam->Up.x, rtRay->m_pCam->Up.y, rtRay->m_pCam->Up.z); up = -up; up = -up; up = -up; CVettore zAxis, xAxis, yAxis; float length, result1, result2, result3; // zAxis = normal(lookAt - position) zAxis = lookAt - position; zAxis = lookAt - position; zAxis = lookAt - position; length = sqrt((zAxis * zAxis) + (zAxis * zAxis) + (zAxis * zAxis)); zAxis = zAxis / length; zAxis = zAxis / length; zAxis = zAxis / length; // xAxis = normal(cross(up, zAxis)) xAxis = (up * zAxis) - (up * zAxis); xAxis = (up * zAxis) - (up * zAxis); xAxis = (up * zAxis) - (up * zAxis); length = sqrt((xAxis * xAxis) + (xAxis * xAxis) + (xAxis * xAxis)); xAxis = xAxis / length; xAxis = xAxis / length; xAxis = xAxis / length; // yAxis = cross(zAxis, xAxis) yAxis = (zAxis * xAxis) - (zAxis * xAxis); yAxis = (zAxis * xAxis) - (zAxis * xAxis); yAxis = (zAxis * xAxis) - (zAxis * xAxis); // -dot(xAxis, position) result1 = ((xAxis * position) + (xAxis * position) + (xAxis * position)) * -1.0f; // -dot(yaxis, eye) result2 = ((yAxis * position) + (yAxis * position) + (yAxis * position)) * -1.0f; // -dot(zaxis, eye) result3 = ((zAxis * position) + (zAxis * position) + (zAxis * position)) * -1.0f; // Set the computed values in the view matrix. matView.SetValore(0, 0, xAxis); matView.SetValore(0, 1, yAxis); matView.SetValore(0, 2, zAxis); matView.SetValore(0, 3, 0.0f); matView.SetValore(1, 0, xAxis); matView.SetValore(1, 1, yAxis); matView.SetValore(1, 2, zAxis); matView.SetValore(1, 3, 0.0f); matView.SetValore(2, 0, xAxis); matView.SetValore(2, 1, yAxis); matView.SetValore(2, 2, zAxis); matView.SetValore(2, 3, 0.0f); matView.SetValore(3, 0, result1); matView.SetValore(3, 1, result2); matView.SetValore(3, 2, result3); matView.SetValore(3, 3, 1.0f);
The results I get from OpenGL and from the SVG output are quite different, but in two days I couldn't come up with a solution.
This is the OpenGL output
And this is my SVG output
As you can see, it's rotation isn't corrent.
Any idea why? The line points are the same and the matrices too, hopefully.
Pasing the matrices I was creating didn't work. I mean, the matrices were wrong, I think, because OpenGL didn't show anything. So I tryed doing the opposite, I created the matrices in OpenGL and used them with my code. The result is better, but not perfect yet.
Now I think the I do something wrong mapping the 3D points into 2D screen points because the points I get are inverted in Y and I still have some lines not perfectly matching.
This is what I get using the OpenGL matrices and my previous approach to map 3D points to 2D screen space (this is the SVG, not OpenGL render):
Ok this is the content of the view matrix I get from OpenGL:
This is the projection matrix I get from OpenGL:
And this is the result I get with those matrices and by changing my 2D point Y coordinate calculation like bofjas said:
It looks like some rotations are missing. My camera has a rotation of 30° on both the X and Y axis, and it looks like they're not computed correctly.
Now I'm using the same matrices OpenGL does. So I think that I'm doing some wrong calculations when I map the 3D point into 2D screen coordinates.
Rather than debugging your own code, you can use transform feedback to compute the projections of your lines using the OpenGL pipeline. Rather than rasterizing them on the screen you can capture them in a memory buffer and save directly to the SVG afterwards. Setting this up is a bit involved and depends on the exact setup of your OpenGL codepath, but it might be a simpler solution.
As per your own code, it looks like you either mixed x and y coordinates somewhere, or row-major and column-major matrices.
Avoiding 16 Common OpenGL Pitfalls, a failure on the programmer's part to fully appreciate the interface's specified behavior. This is not the place for a complete introduction to some of the more complex not shown), then switches to a simple 2D orthographic projection matrix to copy pixels ( glCopyPixels ), and texture download ( glTexImage2D ) paths. Duplicate OpenGL orthographic projection behaviour without OpenGL. I'm encountering a problem trying to replicate the OpenGL behaviour in an ambient without OpenGL. Basically I need to create an SVG file from a list of lines my program creates. These lines are created using an othigraphic projection.
I've solved this problem in a really simple way. Since when I draw using OpenGL it's working, I've just created the matrices in OpenGL and then retrieved them with glGet(). Using those matrices everything is ok.
Calculating the gluPerspective matrix and other OpenGL matrix maths, When we use OpenGL, the first thing we are told is to "just call" a bunch of matrix manipulation… This post is very heavy on mathematics, but I'll try not to assume That's the basic principle of the orthographic projection matrix, but we Unspecified Behaviour · Customize; Follow; Sign up · Log in · Copy Part 2 of OpenGl experiments Object Used: Teapot (Using inbuilt function glutSolidTeapot) This video details how we have gone about perspective and orthographic projection for 3D objects in OpenGL.
You're looking for a specialized version of orthographic (oblique) projections called isometric projections. The math is really simple if you want to know what's inside the matrix. Have a look on Wikipedia
The Perspective and Orthographic Projection Matrix (The OpenGL , You might think that orthographic projections are of no use today. Indeed, what people strive for whether in films or games, is photorealism for which perspective A computer monitor is a 2D surface. A 3D scene rendered by OpenGL must be projected onto the computer screen as a 2D image. GL_PROJECTION matrix is used for this projection transformation. First, it transforms all vertex data from the eye coordinates to the clip coordinates.
OpenGL loads matrices in column major(opposite of c++).for example this matrix:
[1 ,2 ,3 ,4 , 5 ,6 ,7 ,8 , 9 ,10,11,12, 13,14,15,16]
loads this way in memory:
|_1 _| |_5 _| |_9 _| |_13_| |_2 _| . . .
so i suppose you should transpose those matrices from openGL(if you`re doing it row major)
Apply projection and camera views, Without this calculation, objects drawn by OpenGL ES are skewed by the unequal proportions of the view window. A projection transformation Duplicate OpenGL orthographic projection behaviour without OpenGL c++ opengl matrix asked Oct 6 '14 at 15:52 stackoverflow.com
OpenGL Correctness Tips, Assume error behavior on the part of an OpenGL implementation may For example, do not animate a rotation by continually calling Specify the orthographic projection with integer coordinates, as shown in the following example. moving line vertices close enough to the pixel centers. syntax. Copy. for Graphics and Multimedia CSE418 Lab Antara Srivastava 14BCE1063 Aashita Kawatra 14BCE1200.
Appendix H, Do not count on the error behavior of an OpenGL implementation - it might you must carefully specify both the orthographic projection and the vertices of Use glLoadIdentity() to initialize a matrix, rather than loading your own copy of the 6 videos Play all C/C++ OpenGL Tutorials | Computer Graphics using OpenGL and GLUT The Pentamollis Project Predicting the Future of the Web Development (2020 and 2025) - Duration: 29:31. Coding
[PDF] 3D Computer Graphics A Mathematical Introduction with OpenGL, The target specifies which OpenGL buffer to copy data to. The fourth parameter “orthographic projection” or a “perspective transformation.”. But the orthographic projection doesn't change their size according to their depth. Moreover, the reason the floor "disappears" in the orthographic projection is that the floor is "infinitely thin" and oriented horizontally. Your orthographic projection resizes the screen so that one pixel in window space corresponds to 1 unit in object space.
- Just FYI: Your method lacks the homogenous division after the projection transformation. It doesn't matter for an orthographic projection, but is vital for a perspective projection to work. As for the ill rotation in your SVG case, I'll have to look into that yet.
- BTW: What happens if you load the matrices you created into OpenGL and try rendering the image using those?
glMatrixMode(...); glLoadMatrix(...)in case you're using the fixed function pipeline.
- and btw you could print the content of the matrices.
- In OpenGL the lower-left corner is 0,0. Try switching to:
2D_point_y = (windowHeight / 2) * -3D_point_y + (windowHeight / 2)for the Y-axis. At least then it will be correct when using the OpenGL matrix
- The OpenGL produces exactly vertical lines for lines of constant X, and sloping lines for lines of constant Y, while your code is producing sloping lines for lines of constant X and exactly horizontal lines for lines of constant Y. I would guess that that indicates you have an inadvertent x-y swap in your code.
- In the last section of your post you said that "I'm using the same matrices OpenGL does" and you still had problems. How else could you determine that they are the same matrices if not with the